Home | Community | Vico Blogs | Virtual Construction Inside Out

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

#7. I rest my case! 200 models?

Posted by Don Henrich on Thu, Apr 30, 2009 @ 05:19 PM
Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | View blog reactions 

The GSA has had over 100 BIM models on a single project according to ENR -- and the count may reach 220!  I have been in more than 100 meetings over the past 4 years where people at the conference room table just wanted there to be 1 model that did everything and wanted me to say so.  But true to my beliefs, there is a need for more than 1 model.  There is also a need for a Services team to assist the customer in achieving his or her Construction Management goals, particularly when firms are tooling up their BIM skills and/or when an Owner mandates a project must be done in BIM.

 

The snippet below is excerpted from Nadine Post's 4-29-09 ENR article, "Digging into 3D Modeling Unearths Many Worms."  The article illustrates that user experience is exactly as I have been portraying it for 5 years.  It's good to hear someone else say it!

_____________________

 

BIM veterans also agree that modeling changes the design and construction process. The idea is simple: eliminate redrawing the drawings by putting information in once and using it over and over again; catch conflicts before construction begins rather than in the field, when construction dollars are being spent; and use VDC for estimating, scheduling and fabrication. The execution is difficult. BIM veterans caution rookies to hang on tight and expect the unexpected.

The redesign of the design process needs to take into account the order of construction and model content. It's important to resist the urge to model until protocols are worked out and the program is set.

 

Sources have learned the hard way that there are no minor design changes, especially if models have already been coordinated. For example, if an engineer moves a beam it can affect other systems, and their models, down the food chain. Models then have to be reviewed, adjusted, checked and re-coordinated.

 

In the best of all worlds, the contractor and prime trade contractors should be in the room during design process redesign and at times, during design. Input on cost, constructibility and schedule can save model rework and field problems.

 

Design-construction collaboration is not as easy in a traditional design-bid-build environment as it is with integrated project delivery, design-build and construction management at-risk. For an IPD hospital project for Sutter Health, 30 leaders of the building team spent nearly six months redesigning the design process, moving sticky notes around on a wall (see p. 28).

 

BIM means more time is spent on design. This can be irksome to designers if they are not compensated. Many maintain they are doing the contractors' work, without reward. Designers also find that to produce 2D drawings from BIMs they must revamp traditional in-house workflows to align with 3D model conventions.

 

BIM rookies should get help, define a process and expect the unexpected.

At BIM's conception, many expected there would be one BIM per building. The lesson learned is most BIM-enabled projects have myriad models. Many times the design model cannot be used by the trade contractor directly, thanks to software incompatibility or set-up, or both. Most often designers won't give their models to the contractor for fear of liability if there is a computer glitch or a dimensional inaccuracy. Those that do share usually issue a disclaimer, "Use this at your own risk, for reference only." That means the contractor has to check every detail of a design BIM. Often, the trade contractor's detailer finds it easier to create a model from 2D drawings produced from the design model.

 

On the courthouse project, there are more than 19 design BIMs and more than 60 construction BIMs. On the hospital, so far there are 125 models. That number is expected to grow to 220.

So much for the idea of one model per project. So much for the idea of entering information once and using it over and over again. So much for reducing the likelihood of human error while remodeling.

 

Sources advise that if BIM is a mandate from above, be sure to nail down owner's expectations for each building team member-especially if they are not outlined in a contract. Speak up if the expectations seem unreasonable or unreachable. Owners can be naive about BIM's capabilities.

Tags: , ,

COMMENTS

This is a great step forward. Many times we have argued of the benefit 'knowledge transfer' on top of direct data transfer. The necessity of multiple models not only goes to the intent of the modeler/designer, but also to the various objectives every model looks to achieve, which inevitably creates the need for different models, different software, different skill sets. Too many have found a marketable benefit in the promise of an all-encompassing model, but overlook the benefit of the knowledge gained, and the checks and balances set up by a multiple model system. It's great that a respected leader like the GSA is speaking to this. Thanks for the post.

posted @ Sunday, May 03, 2009 1:34 PM by Federico Negro


Don: 
 
 
 
I see where a lot of people are selling their services as "BIM Experts". I have had to do several commercial projects before I understood my own BIM workflow; and I have been an architect for 32 years. Just running a BIM authoring software such as Revit, etc. does not a BIM expert make. I now have separate BIM models for my steel stairs, and frame. I have also found that changes are easy for me, but with the combination of my subs; things can get complicated (mystakes are overlooked). I have also found that getting a BIM project to work takes more more effort than just making a model -- slight changes are easily overlooked, and can multiply throughout a project with out being recognized. 
 

posted @ Saturday, May 16, 2009 11:51 PM by Ed Goldberg


Ed,  
I know exactly what you mean. As a Facility Owner, we consume a lot of design and design management services. Almost every contractor/consultant that comes through (even if they can barely open their email or run a ppt slideshow) claims to be able to 'do BIM' or 'handle BIM' or 'oversee the BIM for the entire system' or bill themselves out as 'expert CAD or BIM Management'. I don't buy it from 99% of them. 
 
I've talked to very few BIM "Experts" in this city and they've been on the scene for a long while, learning and teaching and broadening their skills slowly. 
 
So, while folks may be trying to sell themselves and capitalize on our momentum (can't blame them), the moment I'm brought into the room and hear them go on like that and follow up with an apocryphal statement about BIM... I just write them off because they can't be taken seriously. 
 
Obviously, we're all going to be learning something new with every project, but, I want to hire folks who know more than me (not someone who has only been a 'consultant' for the three months since their local reseller training. ;) ). 
 
This article had a great topic!

posted @ Friday, June 12, 2009 7:57 AM by MistressoftheDorkness


How important is it for the Architect to design in a building information modeling environment? Does it make any sense to start the modeling process once the design is done, by the draftsmen or cad tech's? Isn't this a major shift in workflow?

posted @ Friday, August 14, 2009 1:18 PM by Bobby Parker


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.